>Hi Mark ----
>
>It's interesting what you posted about rates. I have seen pretty much the same thing, albeit a low sample group. There was an article that joked about the "easy 5 year learning curve of VFP" not too long ago. I wonder, are the rates starting to reflect that being good with VFP *is* an accomplishment?

Has it been 5 years since the introduction of VFP 3.0? Maybe its just now that a lot of VFP programmers are getting really good at O-O programming!

Peter Robinson