>>I'd LOVE to see both VFP5 and VFP6 get better error handling to replace the C000005 errors!
>>
>
>Keep dreaming, Barbara; it's an error captured by the operating system that flat out kills VFP, like a GPF...
The joke here is that they just wanted people to think they were trying to improve on the GPF, so they gave it a new name...next version, new name, and so on...
The Anonymous Bureaucrat,
and frankly, quite content not to be
a member of either major US political party.
