Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
ADO/VFP Whitepaper
Message
De
12/05/1999 10:34:49
Bob Macwilliam
Euphoria Media Solutions
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
 
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Client/serveur
Divers
Thread ID:
00216673
Message ID:
00217828
Vues:
32
You Wrote...

"FWIW, remote views are a waste of time. Anybody who has done any C/S work of note knows this to be true. As for SPT being much more productive, as far as creating VFP cursors automatically, you have a point here. However, the issue of how you pass data to other components remains an issue. ADO allows you to work with objects and OLE-DB providers, which is WAY more productive than SPT."

Just curious... I've worked on a product that serves as both a single user product and C/S. We used the CodeBook framework and sure it had bugs, but in my opinion was a fundamentally sound framework that saved lots of time when developing a product like ours that runs off of either a SQL Server or VFP backend with a single code base. As I'm sure you're aware, Codebook uses remote views heavily.

Could you eloborate briefly on your statement? I'm genuinely interested in your reasoning.

Thanks,
Bob
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform