>>Here is Symantec's response if anyone is interested:
>>http://servicenews.symantec.com/cgi-bin/newsgroups.pl?article=1626&count=50&group=symantec.support.win95.norton2000.retail.general&replycount=1&sortby=BYTDATED&
>
>Ivan I don't see the "error" or the response as a problem. The program is just flagging that it detects date data and that it should be looked into to determine if there is a problem. It seems to me that the product is working and identifying a situation correctly.

I'll have to agree with you, Evan. I think it's should be seen as a method for finding potential problems. It's up to the developer then to be sure that all the date fields that are "flagged" are actually being processed correctly. For a large database, it might actually be handy in case you, as the developer, have forgotten to check a table or two for date fields.

Just my opinion,
Bonnie