OK gotcha. Lead astray by the help system.
Thanks John and thanks Jim B

>Hi Dave ---
>
>No it doesn't. I think you may be confusing the NewObject method with the NEWOBJECT() function.
>
>
>>Ahhh, but NewObject requires an object to add the object to. So I've got the same problem :-). Guess I could have a general purpose object of type custom which I add my objects to, but that's going to make my code a little messier.