We are aware of this. The main reason we are going to use MetaFrame is that it allows remote users to print to their local printers. TS client does not.

>We've been using it for about 6 months now. You may be able to keep using TS & skip MetaFrame completely. For us, the main thing that MetaFrame gave us over TS is that with MetaFrame the client can run DOS, Windows 3.X,95,98 or NT. I believe that TS clients need to be running either 95/NT. MetaFrame is an added layer on top of TS & does provide some additional functionality but I've read somewhere (can't remeber where) that performance is not as quite good as TS.
>
>>Is anybody using this?
>>
>>If so, we already have Terminal Server up and runing with a few clients. If we install MetaFrame, for inhouse testing, on the server runing Terminal Server, will the existing clients (connecting with TS Client) be able to continue working, or will MetaFrame prevent the TS Client users from connecting?