Paul,

I certainly hope that it *DOES* prove to be real solid.

Cheers,

Jim N

>Jim,
>
>>That's reading a WHOLE lot into something!
>>Possibly some of the things presented (or even VFP itself so far) only works with that version.
>>Possibly MS 'insists' that next versions always be used for demos once they attain a certain level.
>>Possibly. . .
>
>Those are certainly legitimate points. I have W2k beta (2031)installed on a PII 266 64 MEG ram. Today will be my first chance to run my legacy VFP 5.0 and VFP 6.0 applications on this machine. I will post back with some preliminary results.
>
>>Personally, I have to doubt that it is far more stable than NT4spX at this point.
>
>I installed W2k on two different computers so far--PII 266 and PII 400--each install was perfect. W2k recognized all my hardware and I was up and running with these computer within one hour. As for stability, I’m going to be testing it extensively in the next month.
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul