>Regarding http://www.bowdoin.edu/~csaunder/programming/siminherit.html
>
>Maybe I'm missing something but it seems to me that you could make a good argument that FPW2.6 was object oriented too

I know. People think OOP is something magical but all of classes are eventually compiled into something something close to assembly code (okay okay p-code). OOP is just an abstraction tool. So one could say that assembler supports OOP.

Regarding the link above, there are at least two wizards that make delegation easier. Then one must ask the question "Is simulating inheritance as good as inheritance?"...