>
>WWWC does not use FoxISAPI. It uses wc.dll as the message mechanism between IIS and your app. Rick has written several articles on using FoxISAPI, and even rewrote FoxISAPI in C to fix a problem or two, but it is not the mechanism used in WWWC.
>
>And I didn't say FoxISAPI is more trouble than it's worth. I was saying that with the tools already available to you, there's really not much need to write another ISAPI application to interface IIS and VFP. I'm sure that if one's needs were extremely unusual, then you might find shortcomings in FoxISAPI, ASP and WWWC that you could not get across, but retreiving form variables and returning HTML are not unusual needs, and they are provided for by what's already written.

I understand. I did not read your prior post carefully. Thanks again.