>You must always think that all (on one computer) timer events procedures cannot use more than 100% CPU time. And Windows must also run the mechanism for more timers (on only "hard" one) on the same CPU.
>
>This is way timers are not recomended. Also, it's good to know the timer events have the lowest priority (as far as I remember). That means you can't build a reliable process on timers.
>
>Vlad

That's why I have been searching for a better mouse trap, I mean Timer! (s)

Tom