Tom,
i guess thats what im saying too. OOP is about packaging,
not program design! program design HAS to be done a a
functional level and is really imaterial to packaging...

and the technology has not changed, only the terminology
seems to be changing (i mean, a method is a function), and
it seems to me that an object is just a collection of methods;
didnt we used to call that an 'object module?'

>>Steve, et.al,
>>it has been my observation (recently confirmed in
>>trade magazine) that the reusability of OOP has
>>been
>>greatly exagerated (would they do that?). it
>>seems
>>that a reusability factor of 10-15% is doing real
>>good! REAL GOOD, ive been doing better than that
>>for