>It's not for the faint of heart, that's for sure! :) The more people who participate, the better the information will be. It's really not much different than the self-correcting dynamic in newsgroups.

Having more people on something doesn't mean better quality! :)

>Partly, too...we'll see. So, far I see no reason at to NOT try it.

That's for sure.

>...and I won't even go into my emerging theories that this is at last the *spur* for computers becoming truly a tool of art...much like the break through in the early 20th c. when photography kept thinking it was....oh. Okay. Sorry, off-topic, huh? :)

Is/was art ever a public work?