>>If there's mis-information posted to a threaded forum, you need to read everything to make sure somebody didn't get corrected. On the Wiki, the participants wipe out mis-information when they see it and replace it with correct info.
>
>That's nice in theory, but how do you know that wrong info is replaced with correct info and not correct info with wrong info? Who decides what's right and wrong?

Well they say thats part of the beauty of a Wiki interface, that it's self policing. But I agree with your point. Currently, their working on protocol & guidelines over there and such. I think once it gets off the ground, and things such as last changed datestamps and a list of who contributed their input to a topic, it will be a whole lot easier to judge the accuracy at a glance of posted material.