General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
>I see, that's a good reason. But (you know there's always one) is Send() calling Receive()? If not there's no problem.
>What I meant was exactly the opposite Michel is trying to do:
>Send() just right after a Receive() (Of course he'd have to trigger the process with a Send() first).
How do you fire the next Send() after Receive()?
Vlad
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only