>>Actually, I just thought of another idea. Maybe I can create a view with some extra dummy fields that will essentially force the next record outside the bounds of VFP's internal concept of the window boundaries. Hmmm....?
>
>Give them some nice graphical names, like TTTTTTTT or ____________ or something like that, so they may look like an arabesque on the frame... it may be a welcome refreshment to the look and feel of the Edit pane (only half kidding :).

FYI. This trick doesn't work. Just for grins, I created a test table with 50 fields - more than enough to force the 'next' record to be out of the visible frame when viewed in edit mode (even with the browse window maximized). Didn't matter, VFP still will not resync unless you choose a new record that's at least two away (in current index order). Very strange and unfriendly behavior.
This is bug (not a feature!!), IMNSHO.