>Just a thought!
>
>Is there anything under MS's consideration for simplifying
>"set procedure to "
>
> something similar to NewObject()
>
>or a new way of calling functions without set procedure to.
>
>May be somthing like:
>***
>Function function_name( [p1, [p2, [...]]])in program_or_library_name
>***
>
>and let FoxPro take care of activating and releasing of programs.

Don't use procedure files. Put each function or procedure in it's own file, named the same as the function or procedure or file. Then just call it.