>Arnon, hopefully, i will get this posted by
>adding up front!
>i understand that tools are improving, but
>according to article
>in WINDOW TECH magazine March 96; oop is only
>acheiving a 10-15%
>reusability; and ive been doing better than that
>with the
>techniques that have been around since 1962 and
>published by
>the same gurus who are now tauting oop (yourdon
>etc). as a
>business application programmer, what i see them
>doing is
>nothing more than EXTERNALizing the physical
>attributes of
>my programs (fine not a bad idea) but it doesnt
>help with the
>logic of acct payable or receivable!?
>
>
>>>Your showing your Dinasaur -- I mean age!
>>Someone
>>>once told me that every new generation of PhDs
>>>reinvents the wheel with a new nomenclature in
>>


Lucien

I was hoping you would jump in & pull me out of the fire -- Thanks!

Tom