Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Rushmore Design Flaw Heads-UP!
Message
De
13/07/1999 22:51:02
 
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Divers
Thread ID:
00238826
Message ID:
00241134
Vues:
25
Did you do the same tests with SET OPTIMIZE ON and OFF?

Vlad

>Rushmore is the genie that makes them. If the engine decides that a filtered result set will be the quickest way to go, then it returns them.
>
>I discovered this when I added an index tag on DELETED() (which spawned the other part of this thread), and suddenly I received 'filtered result sets' whereas before the tag I received a NOFILTER version.
>
>The same SQL statement was used for both versions, adding the DELETED() tag returned filtered result sets, deleting it returned NOFILTER versions.
>
>And of course, several commands that had been working with NOFILTER stopped working when the DELETED() tag was added.
>
>That's how we all go into this mess ;)
>
>
>>I haven't read all messages in this thread. What does Rushmore have to do with filtered cursors?
>>
>>Vlad
>>
>>>Just a quick point, NOFILTER is an OK workaround for SELECT..WHERE, as you
>>>say you will always get a file. But SELECT * (no where), the NOFILTER has a negative effect since it copied the entire file, when it this case, the rushmore version works OK...
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform