>The only problem with this in 2.6 should be with dates that are formatted with two digit years. 2.6 will always assume that the first 2 digits are 19. However, with 4 digit years what I'm about to type works fine. I've tested the following code in FPW 2.6a and it works fine in both cases.

> code clipped...

George,

Thanks, this works great.  Don't know why I got blank dates when I did basically the same thing manually... but, don't care at this point.

This is the second little code snippet you gave me I put to work right away!

BOb