Hi Jim,

>First let me observe that no one who responded seemed to have picked up on the "B" option you had, namely B) A nice big blurb in the docs under _pageno for how to achive page#/tota pages in your VFP report. It seems to be a no-no to even suggest that VFP's documentation could use some improvement. Even when, as you cite (and which we all know happens to countless other "features" requiring relentlessly repeated questions) it comes up frequently.

Parden me for jumping in: Quite right, but the point of "B" is a little less surface. Some members, in their attempts to make VFP better, suggests things that may already exist in the system. And then they get many many emails saying you can. So I think choice "B" was just a safegaurd agains "semi-flames".

Also, whats wrong with saying: "You know, we might be a little more producive if the documentation read...". The VFP docs are great, but nothings perfect.