General information
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Hi Nigel,
I take it that your gut, along with some testing, tells you that this is not running as reasonably expected.
I know nothing about CITRIX, but seem to remember some threads a while back about performance issues with it.
A search on CITRIX gave me 81 messages, some titles seeming related to performance (I did not read them though).
Good luck,
Jim N
>>I can only say that some of the methods should be reviewed and time testing should be done with a variety of number of users accessing the table at the same time. In other words, sometimes a method that proves to be the fastest when you are accessing the table as the single user will not be the fastest method when there are many users.
>>
>>I would also check each operation to see how fast (slow?) it is when done from a remote machine and how it does from the application run on the file server. If the file server can do some operations a LOT faster, I would explore the use of DCOM to get these operations done on the file server.
>>
>>I guess you might want to look at SQL Server too if this continues to be a problem.
>>
>>Joe
>>
>>
>
>Hi Joe,
>
>All time testing has been done, it works ok normally. DCOM and SQL Server won't be quick enough - they want answers NOW. I've given them the option of having the inserts queued through an interim table. I think that's the quickest option.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only