Your message was cut off again, but I think I got the basic idea and I AGREE in theory. But I found too many difficulties with things that should be simple ... for example:

I found that when I designated a field as a PRIMARY KEY. That the DBC would prevent me from having any other fields with that same value EVEN IF IT WAS CONTAINED IN A DELETED RECORD. That is crazy and I do not wish to even hear of a WORKAROUND for it.

Another biggie for me was this:

All of my systems are designed to build the TABLES and INDEXES automatically when first executed. They will also detect a need for structural changes to tables and indexes each time they are execut