Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
TableUpdate?
Message
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00246889
Message ID:
00247027
Views:
29
Barbara,

Thank you for the help.

To answer your questions....

> 1. Do you ReQuery() the list after making the new array?

Yes!


> 2. Have you checked the new array to see if the data is there? In other words >are you losing the edited data when you do the SQL or when updating
> the list?

Yes! The array does NOT contain the data that has been modified, only
when I add a new record does the array contain what is actually in the
table. And, the weird thing is that I am not losing the edited data. If
I run my form again, the edited data appears in the list box.


> Walk through the process with debug checking the edited data at each point. >You'll probably have a better grasp of the problem then.

I have walked through the process several times in debug. What is happening is this: I edit the data, I run a process which issues a REPLACE on the new data, then I issue a TABLEUPDATE() command. At this point I check in debug and find the following things: The table contains the newly edited data. I then re-dimension the array to nothing (to get rid of all elements) and I check the array in debug and it is empty. I then issue the SQL statement which takes data from this table and stuffs it into the aforementioned array. I check the array and the old information (as it existed prior to the edit) is still there!! It appears, as I stated before, that the re-issue of the SQL command is somehow grabbing data that is stored or cached in memory and not directly from the table. At this point, barring any other suggestions I am going to try and force the table close, re-open it and then run the SQL again. If this works, I guess it will be just another weird bug/anomaly in foxpro. It doesn't make sense to me, but that is just the way things are I guess.

...douglas
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform