Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
SQL Server slower than VFP?
Message
From
06/08/1999 10:54:44
 
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Client/server
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00250319
Message ID:
00250670
Views:
11
John,

PMFJI - but as I am very interested in your comment about "Remote Views sucking" as I am making the move to SQL 7 from VFP native and have lived with nothing but local views in my app. I was hoping to just convert them up to Remote Views. Questions:

1 - Why do they "suck"? what is it that is so bad?
2 - without them - what is the best way to get the user an updatable subset of records to work with in your opinion?

PS (Local PA guy insider question) - you guys get any rain up there yseterday? not a drop down here (in Boothwyn just above Deleware border)

Thanks!
Ken

>>In a word, remote views suck. If you want the best performance, create a stored procedure and call the stored procedure via SPT if you need a VFP cursor.
Ken B. Matson
GCom2 Solutions
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform