>Hi Guys,
>
>>I doubt that any method developed by the VFP team would come in the form of a function (like my example), more likely some other special text in the properties field, or one of the reserved fields. A function I guess is misleading, because it would never actually get run, just parsed by the form or class designer.
>
>I would imagine a corresponding clause in define class, however, of course, this would only be useful if you could visual create a subclass, based on a class stored in code. It this even possible now? Maybe another wish?

This is not possible now- what is the point, besides changing your mind? If you need to do it though, Tom Rettig wrote a utility that will convert a programmatic class definition to a class in a vcx. It is available here in the files section under TRUE (Tom Rettig's Utility Extensions).