>Hi Stephen,
>
>Just for your edification, some new "facts" (in quotes because I have a suspicion - not really widely shared, I'll admit, that it is really a **change** in Rushmore behaviour) about a TAG on DELETED() is that, *most* of the time such a TAG will hurt rather than help **IF** SET DELETED is ON.
>
>If this was done 'by design' by the MS team in the relatively recent past, then we deserve to have been told about it. If it is a 'mistake' in VFP, then it ought to be corrected ASAP.
>
>regards,
>
>Jim N
>
Thanks for the heads up on that one!

I've been using the deleted() tag for 9 or 10 years. And set deleted on for as long as FP has been out.

Old habits die hard!

Thanks.