Hi Christof,
It sure looks to be the case.
Now I did have to manage several always-at-the-2-gig-level tables several years ago, but there our standard was SET DELETED OFF.
Cheers,
Jim N
>>Hi Jim,
>>
>>>I'll admit, that it is really a **change** in Rushmore behaviour)
>>
>>Actually, when I had the discussion with Walter about this several months ago, I tested it in VFP and FPD 2.5, and I haven't noticed that much difference between both. I rather suspect that the environment and we have changed. We used to have faster networks (10 Mips compared to a RAS dial-up line), smaller tables (who had to manage tables in the range of 1 GB several years ago, who had the hard disks to do so?), the concept has changed from xBase to client/server with a lot more SQL commands and so on...
>>
>>
>>Christof
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement