Jeff,

Nothing happens, that's what I discovered. IndexSeek is no faster than SEEK.

>>
>>>
>>>My understanding about indexseek was not that IT would be fasted but, it does not move the record pointer.
>>>
>>
>>It seemed to me that not moving the record pointer means one less disk read, ergo faster. So much for reasoning. :)
>
>What happens to your time when used as indicated?
>SEEK
> Do a seek--return to origin
>
>VS Indexseek
> No Move
>
>How Much faster (if any) is that?
>
>
>Jeff