I agree completely. Yeah, I hated the problems with the Clipper Summer '87 1:58am version!!! ... those two minutes made a world of difference!

That's why I said that version numbers *use to* mean something, now days they are useless, unless you happen to follow this stuff meticulously... like we have to... but not clients/users. You're right, we jumped from Win3.1 to Win 95... wow, does that mean I missed 91.9 versions!!! Man, am I behind the times! Clients/users are completely confused about Win 2000... let's see...

"Is it the upgrade to Win 98? Or is it the Y2K compliant version of windows? Or is it NT/98 combined? Wait, what does NT stand for? We're soooooooo confused!!!"

>IMO, this is still better than the way Clipper did it. Let's see, I needed Summer '87, the 2:00 AM version. It also beats using the years. Personally, I think Win 98, WIN 2000, Office 2000 are stupid names.