Hello,
I was just going through some code in a FP2.6 program, and saw following code:
REPLACE ALL MyField WITH NewValue FOR ThisField=ThatValue
I know that the ALL is not necessary here, because the FOR will do the job already (to replace all).
But my question is:
Is the above code much slower than it would be without the ALL, or does FoxPro just not worry about the ALL.
maybe someone knows the answer.
Thank you for help.