Walter Meester
HoogkarspelNetherlands
Jim,
>>I did ??? Well I've must have been drunk.. ;-) I'll review my post to see where I was uncarefull.
>Without reviewing the prior, I remember a statement that RELEASE releasing only the memvar is OK by you. That is what I was referring to.
Let me clarify myself. Yes when a variable is relaesed it may release it's object also. But what about other refering variables (or even more complex: properties of other objects). IHMO they should be set to .NULL. rather then being released also.
>>Yes, exactly, and what I also want is to do this implicitly by SQL (or xBase command) rather than explicitly.
>>hmmm. This new topic is so new, i've got to rethink this whole issue before I can take a definite standpoint. Sure I like the idea, but have no idea how this should be implemented (syntax and new features, not C++ implementation).
>To me too, actually (as far as HOW to get it done). That's also why a dialogue is so important on issues of this msgnitude, even if it turned out to be only the two of us < S >. We'll have to find some way to get one going.
Yup, I agree...
Jim, Why don't we call you demand for a new whishlist section, just the Thinktank section. This would impose not only new whished, but also other opinions about already accomplished features or about difficult problems ?
Jim N
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only