>>>>
>>>>Hi Craig,
>>>>
>>>>Perhaps, perhaps not. It could be a transitional product like VFP 3.0 that is capable of producing applications based on the underlying OS. I, for one, found it interesting that MS demo'd the product under Win 2000 (which is still in beta) rather than an existing (and much more likely to be stable) environment like Win 98. What can we really say for sure? Probably, not much, but it is fun to theorize.< g >
>>>
>>>That's would be ok as long as it isn't a kludge like Win32s was.
>>
>>Motion seconded! But I wonder if Win64s would be twice the kludge or just half.:-)
>
>Oh ... much more. :-)
>2**32 is approximately 4.3E+9
>2**64 is approximately 1.8E+19
>:-)

ROFL!