Michel,

I must say that Refox sounds a lot like the bully on the street, who demands payment because he can beat you up. In this case Refox seems to demand that you buy a license to protect yourself from it!

These are not the ethics I would like to make my living with!

Regards,
Jim N.

>>With Refox, you just place one line of code in your main FoxPro program, and then "brand" it using Refox. This is done using a password, and without the correct password people cannot de-compress this file. I've also discovered that even with the password, Refox doesn't do a very good job in de-compiling code. It misses quite a bit, and the code cannot be run as is.
>
>Thanks, I will probably go with Refox to protect the EXE.
>
>Also, as mentioned to Dave, I made a mistake because I thought Refox was Cryptor.