>>Can't you define some standard classes? Do you really need to define class at runtime? As long as you must know what properties are available for the parameter object, it seems you already know hoe the object is defined. So... probably you can define it from the very begining. You can use CreateObject anywhere after that.
>>
>>Or, I probably don't get what the problem is.
>>
>>Vlad
>
>Your Right Paul, But It will have a lot of class in my class library parameters and if i try to reduce It with class more general i will have a lot of check to do in my method.
>
>Thank's Paul i will start with this Because you can't have to much of good thing so it's ok for a lot of class ...
>
>Hey Paul Do you prefer we call you Paul or Vlad ???

I don't care too much. I prefer Vlad, but for peoples down here Paul is more "easy". Since there are also other Pauls here on UT and sometimes I received replies intended for others, on UT I use my "second-first name" (e.g. Vlad) :).

Vlad