Hi Jim,

>
>Well I've always considered that a smaller group, skunkworks-like in nature, can get a whole lot more done than some huge bloated group with (necessarily) excess "bureaucracy".

I think it's a double-edged sword. You are right in some respects, but a limited number of staff also generates limited opportunities IMHO.

>And surely we bebefit from more consistency of interfaces between sub-objects (for lack of a better word) of a system. Look at Office, touted as "common interface". That may be close at the top level, but as soon as you get to dialogues the interface is all over the map!

Consistent within VFP, sure.


>
>>Hi Dionisio,
>>
>>>1-How much people do work developing Visual FoxPro?
>>
>>I think 10-15 or so.
>>
>>>2-How many people of Fox Software's original team are still working in the development of Visual FoxPro?
>>
>>1, I believe.