>Wow did i do that? (see other reply)

No, my fault - I embed a table tag and the UT's parser does not like table tags!
I used the & lt; and & gt; to get the < and > symbols to show up on the message. There is another way is there not??? When you replied it used the actual symbols.

>Only 1 worthwhile note in that other reply... that the new Netscape 4.7 claims to have more support for DHTML but I havent had a chance to dig into it yet.

I have not looked at the new features but standardization of DHTML between browsers is a big issue. For now most DHTML work I do is for our intranet where IE +4.0 is the standard.