>This is all interesting food for thought though.

Isn't it?

>I didn't realize that objects created with SCATTER NAME have no name or class properties. Surely then they are some special category of object.

I know! And this is why I saw no really good reason for the = operator not to work because they do reference the same "parent".


>Thanks Albert for pointing out COMPOBJ(), that one passed me by completely. It can't compare ALL of the properties though, as the name properties would be different.