>>And one additional point: I've been testing under NT, and a few places where I had multiple macros with '+' between them that ran in Win9x errored out in NT. Substituting in parens enclosing ordinary strings fixed the problem.
>
>Thanks for the HU! Is this just with Paths, or anything?

Yes, I think it was mostly related to paths and/or alias and DBC references, in various different commands. I've been pleasantly surprised how many different commands/clauses accept parens, just never had a reason to try some of them before.