>>>Is there a 2/29/2000? Or not. I seem to recall that there isn't because it's a leap century but I'm unclear on this.
>>
>>Yes - there is a {^2000-02-29}; Centuries only have the leap day if the century is divisible by 4 - eg 1900, no, 2000, yes, 2100 no, 2200 no, 2300 no, 2400 yes...
>
>I think you mean 400... 2100 / 4 = 525... so, by what you say it WOULD be a leap year, but you listed it as NO, since 2100 / 400 = 5.25.
>
>Also, everything is divisable by 4 or 400... I think we mean to say EVENLY divisable.
>

ARRGH. You're lucky you aren't here right now...