>I not sure I can go back to VFP on the backend. Don't get me wrong, VFP is my tool of choice for COM/DCOM servers doing tier two and three work and there's nothing wrong with it for the UI either. My latest app uses VB, VFP, MSMQ, MTS, and SQL Server so I don't think I qualify as a "tool nazi" <g>.
>


Hi, Bob.

How does the raw speed of SQL Server when accessed from VFP remote views compare to using VFP local tables?

What are your main reasons for prefering SQL Server over VFP tables for data storage?

Peter Robinson