>In the latest and greatest Windows Sources magazine is an article on Microsoft's Visual Studio 97. Hey, they had the guts to print a section on Visual FoxPro 5.0! However, if you go and read that section, I believe that you'll find inaccuracies and in general that the reviewer is just plain missing the point of VFP.
>
>For those of you who don't subscribe (probably most everybody), you don't have to rush out to buy a copy to see what is in print. Just go to the following URL:
>
>
http://www.zdnet.com/wsources/content/current/rsub6.html>
>I am going to comment directly to that mag about how I feel about the article in a constructive a manner as is possible for me. I invite all of you who give a rip to do the same.
And while your at it tell them about VFP 5.5 VFP Basic edition. I am sure they may want you to do a review on it! (eg)(ROFL) (DUCK!)
Tom