>In the latest and greatest Windows Sources magazine is an article on Microsoft's Visual Studio 97. Hey, they had the guts to print a section on Visual FoxPro 5.0! However, if you go and read that section, I believe that you'll find inaccuracies and in general that the reviewer is just plain missing the point of VFP.
>
>For those of you who don't subscribe (probably most everybody), you don't have to rush out to buy a copy to see what is in print. Just go to the following URL:
>
>http://www.zdnet.com/wsources/content/current/rsub6.html
>
>I am going to comment directly to that mag about how I feel about the article in a constructive a manner as is possible for me. I invite all of you who give a rip to do the same.

The summary is bad, I agree. Some of the actual article, though painful is true. Yeah the guy misses the whole point of VFP but does paint a more accurate picture of VFP as MS's 'Red Headed Step Child' of the MS Product line.

Tom