>> That's fine with me.
>>
>> I will do my best to stay out of your threads from now on.
>>
>Don't be that way about it. :)
>
>This REPLACE phenomena existed even back in FoxBASE+ days. It was
>annoying from the standpoint that it really didn't reflect the EOF
>condition
>in the workarea you were referencing. As you've stated, the "IN" clause
>was added and that certainly helps to avoid that situation today.
>
>No big deal.
>
>==Carl
No disparagement intended, Carl & I were just banterning on the definition of a "BUG"