>
>IMO the article was pretty good in that it described a method the author said worked. And he was humble enough to state that if anyone had a better approach he would like to hear it. It is so hard for these magazines to get experts to write these things that I think we should not beat up on someone too badly if after published it is discovered that other silent types have a much better approach.

I had real difficultly with the technical parts that were wrong. The biggest thing was continually referring to the OCX, when it clearly wasn't used.