Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Referential integrity: restrict, cascade, ignore and CHA
Message
 
 
To
16/11/1999 13:28:57
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00291533
Message ID:
00291562
Views:
25
>With the combined COVERAGE table, the OFF staff fits RI, but the ON staff fits a business rule that does not translate well into RI (at least as it relates to DELETE action). I think you understand it well enough to know that the 3 choices won't work here. Well, actually, the ON staff does fit the ignore option for RI, as long as you handle setting null some other way.

Hi David. I think this problem will still exist since I would need a link between the two coverage table and neither rule fits there either. You have given me food for thought though.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform