I see why PUTM, would disagree with an increase, they're being charged for something mostly provided by them, I come here for the content, they're knowledge, are they getting a share of the profits?, no, they're getting they're fee raised.
If I worked on my own I'd probably pay for a membership, but I don't, I would expect my employer to do so, but I couldn't justify it, since I can post and get answers for free.
It's not that much money but this is basically a newsgroup, just a gathering spot for people who share they're knowledge, probably a subscription to Foxtalk would be better justified, I don't suppose article writers there do it for free(or do they?) in comparison to the content provided here.
I don't have nearly the level of knowledge of a lot of people here, but I try to contribute once in a while, trying somehow to give back some of the help I've recieved, and I don't appreciate being called a "freebie boy".
>I certainly agree with JVP. It is time to drop the freebie members.
>Perhaps that alone will solve the bottleneck problems. Right now
>it appears the only difference between a free and PUTM is the capability
>to search. Let the freebie boys and girls start paying for the service
>of this business... Maybe this could be made effective Jan 1, 2000.
>
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only