Unfortunately, Mark's point is legitimate one.

>Mark, you're letting this get to you. Nothing has changed on the UT as far as technical support.
>
>
>>
>>Enough is enough and I've had it up to here with the nonsense on this forum.
>>
>>What Michel wants to do with his business is just that, his business. I've been a lurker, a contributor, a PUTM and now a SUTM depending on my needs at the time.
>>
>>I, and many others, have put up with an awful lot of guff on the UT and for myself I didn't understand most of it as I'm not American and the things you take for granted make no sense outside of North America. I can't be "part of the UT community", as I live several thousand miles away and trying to carry on any type of relationship with a bounce time of 16 hours or more is difficult at best.
>>
>>Once, UT was the place to go to get answers on things FoxPro. Now? Well, you can still get answers but you've got to wade through a lot of other stuff to get to the nitty gritty. Besides which, there are plenty of other places to get the same answers from.
>>
>>Take yesterday (19th November 1999) and the thread "My 2-cents perf. and sticking the PUTM with the bill.....", Useful FoxPro knowledge? Not in a million years! That thread alone accounted for about 25% of the total message traffic. Worth the PUTM fee. Not in my opinion. Worth the SUTM fee? Again, not in my opinion.
>>
>>I can get the same answers about FoxPro elsewhere on the Internet without having to deal with the rudeness and sometime downright insulting behaviour of SUTM, PUTM and MVP alike and I intend to do just that.
>>
>>Don't bother replying to this, I won't be logging on again to read them.
>>
>>I won't say it's been a pleasure since for some time now it hasn't.
>>
>>H & G