Thank you John. It nice that you like some of our ideas. The pricing was some thing that we discussed 4 months ago, the bandwidth was plan in the last 6 months but the graphic option was a direct impact to your constructive criticizes on UT. I thing that Rob P. messages that started this graph option and the default value for the refresh delay.

Anyway, it is not important who had the ideas but that we did the implementation. What important is that we all work to get this community stranger.

I like to thank all members, like you John, that help this site by taking the time to reply to threads to help other or the do constructive criticizes.

Thank you all.

>PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND......
>
>Well, it is fair to say my original post caused a fire storm of sorts. For as PO'd as a lot of folks got, it lit a fire. I offer this:
>
>1. The ability to turn graphics off, pictures and flags...
>2. The bandwidth of the UT is going to be doubled.
>3. The bandwidth will be 6x times what it is now by 12/31
>4. Reconsidersation of PUTM pricing....
>
>My big ticket items were centered around performance and getting it fixed now. When I need to criticize, I do so. But, when it is time to say thanks, I also do that.
>
>So.....
>
>Thank you Michel for taking up the concerns of me and several other folks.