>With everyone around here venting for the last week or two, now its my turn.
>
>In case you've missed it there is now a lawsuit against MS, here in CA, charging that based on MS being called a monopoly, Windows should have cost $49.
>
>I think it's high time that penalities be established for bringing forth a frivolous lawsuit. Both for the plaintiffs and the attornies involved. This is beyound ridiculous.
>
>One of the "facts" these folks are basing their claim on, is from a Stanford professor who claims that without a "monopoly" Windows would have cost $79 instead of $89.
>
>This is just getting way out of hand.

Never happen until we start electing a majority of non-lawyer legislators to office. What an obvious conflict of interest our legislative bodies have become.