Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Why VFP
Message
De
23/11/1999 19:05:41
 
 
À
23/11/1999 18:51:55
Bill Totten
William Totten & Associates, Inc.
Indiana, États-Unis
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
00294419
Message ID:
00294714
Vues:
34
>"shrinking market" or "limited market-share" is simply an ignorant position - There are a lot more Toyotas (large market-share) than Mercedes, but few would argue that a Benz is a bad car!
>
>Quantity does not mean quality...
>
>My read on Delphi is third-party via one of my ex-programmers - he liked it very much, thought it was more "stable" than VFP (however, it was back in the days of VFP3, the first and buggy version of VFP).
>
>I can do anything I want in VFP. If I was in your position I would make a list of "showstoppers" and "absolute gotta-haves". Whatever environment fit in (or out of) these lists would point me to the correct choice. Also, I cross-platform into Linux is a "reasonable" possiblity trhen Delphi is your choice.
>

That's an overstatement. Delphi can do things at a low level much better than VFP - I'd not want to write a device driver in VFP, and at present at least, VFP can't create ActiveX Controls - Delphi can. It also can do things more efficiently with structures than VFP, in large part because of how VFP manages its variables and name space. Both tools have a place - I just find that most places that I'd choose Delphi over VFP, I'd rather use C++
EMail: EdR@edrauh.com
"See, the sun is going down..."
"No, the horizon is moving up!"
- Firesign Theater


NT and Win2K FAQ .. cWashington WSH/ADSI/WMI site
MS WSH site ........... WSH FAQ Site
Wrox Press .............. Win32 Scripting Journal
eSolutions Services, LLC

The Surgeon General has determined that prolonged exposure to the Windows Script Host may be addictive to laboratory mice and codemonkeys
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform